top of page
Background_2.jpg
Search

Rethinking Feedback: Why Positive Reinforcement Matters

  • Writer: László Szabó
    László Szabó
  • Jan 3
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jan 4

I recently returned from a leadership conference and noticed something familiar: when we talk about feedback, almost everyone immediately thinks about corrective feedback — telling people what went wrong and how they should have done it differently. It struck me how deeply ingrained this view is, even though my experience — and research — suggests a different approach: leaning into positive feedback to reinforce what works and pull people toward the behaviours we want more of.

“Leaders often underestimate the power of recognition, focusing on mistakes instead of reinforcing success.”



Why Positive Feedback Feels Awkward


It’s fascinating how giving positive feedback can feel more challenging than pointing out mistakes. Leaders often hesitate because it seems less “necessary” or actionable.

Correction is concrete — it identifies a gap, a deviation from expectation. Positive feedback, in contrast, requires attention, presence, and thoughtfulness: noticing subtleties, naming patterns, and articulating why they matter.

Psychologically, this discomfort is understandable. Humans are wired to notice threats and errors more than successes (Baumeister et al., 2001). In leadership terms, this bias makes corrective feedback feel urgent and essential, while praise seems optional or indulgent. Leaders may worry that recognition will dilute their authority or that it’s not “serious” leadership. Research shows the opposite: leaders generous with recognition are more respected and more effective when corrective feedback is necessary.

Organizational culture adds another layer. Many companies embed “constructive criticism” into formal reviews, while recognition is informal, ad hoc, or difficult to measure. Without the right language or habits, leaders default to correction because it feels safer and more structured. Positive feedback demands intentionality — noticing, reflecting, and amplifying what is working.

“Acknowledging what works is not soft. It is strategic and subtly transformative.”

The Science Behind Positive Reinforcement

Positive feedback is far more than a morale booster. It shapes behaviour, strengthens motivation, and builds the psychological foundation for performance. Recognition helps people repeat effective behaviours, take initiative, and engage deeply with their work.

Research shows it strengthens:

  • Self-efficacy — confidence in one’s ability to act

  • Innovative behaviour — trying new approaches without fear

  • Autonomy — taking ownership and responsibility for outcomes

When teams experience frequent, meaningful recognition, it signals what is valued and creates a culture of safety and growth. In contrast, corrective feedback alone often focuses attention on mistakes, increases stress, and reduces engagement.


Cognitive biases, underestimation of positive reinforcement, and lack of training in recognition all contribute to this blind spot. Cultivating the habit of positive feedback is less about soft skills and more about strategic attention: noticing, reflecting, and communicating insight in ways that inspire action.


“Positive feedback doesn’t soften standards — it pulls an organisation toward excellence.”

Inviting Reflection

What if leadership was less about pointing out mistakes and more about amplifying what works? Feedback is a mirror: it reflects both what people do and what leaders value. How often do we pause to consider the behaviours we want to see more of — and the power of acknowledging them?


Leadership is not about quick fixes or step-by-step tips. It is about presence, attention, and intention. When we notice what is working and articulate it with thoughtfulness, we create the space for growth, curiosity, and trust.


Next time you enter a feedback conversation — or simply speak with your team — I invite you to experiment with the following questions:

  • What behaviours do I want to amplify?

  • How can my recognition pull, rather than push?

  • How might I create the conditions for people to thrive through attention and intention?

“Leadership is not just correcting mistakes — it is cultivating excellence.”

References

Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C. & Vohs, K. (2001) ‘Bad is stronger than good’, Review of General Psychology, 5(4), pp. 323–370.

Adams, W. & Myles, T. (2025) The Power of Positive Feedback, Psychology Today. Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meaningful-work/202507/the-power-of-positive-feedback (Accessed: 3 January 2026).

Gardiner, K. (2023) How to Give Positive Feedback: A Crucial Leadership Skill, PositivePsychology.com. Available at: https://positivepsychology.com/positive-feedback/ (Accessed: 3 January 2026).

Zenger, J. & Folkman, J. (2020) Why Positive Feedback is Difficult to Give, Zenger Folkman. Available at: https://zengerfolkman.com/articles/why-is-it-so-difficult-for-leaders-to-give-positive-feedback/ (Accessed: 3 January 2026).

Zenger Folkman (2024) Leaders Should Reevaluate Their Feedback Preferences, ZengerFolkman.com. Available at: https://zengerfolkman.com/articles/leaders-should-reevaluate-their-feedback-preferences/ (Accessed: 3 January 2026).

Study: Leaders’ Positive Feedback Influences Employees’ Innovative Behavior, MDPI Sustainability. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1901 (Accessed: 3 January 2026).

Forbes articles referenced via Zenger & Folkman insights (2014, 2017). Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackzenger/2014/03/21/the-feedback-conundrum-does-positive-or-negative-feedback-help-you-most/ (Accessed: 3 January 2026).


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page